Barrier to Compulsory Schooling: Socio-Economic Drivers of Child Labour in Uttar Dinajpur
Downloads
Child labour continues to be a significant barrier to universal compulsory education, particularly in economically marginalised districts. This research addresses the socio-economic conditions that compel children to work and thus denies them access to compulsory schooling in Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal, India. This mixed-methods research proceeds with a household survey of 200 families, key informant interviews with local school officials, and focus group discussions with child labourers before encapsulating the central economic and social barriers to compulsory schooling as poverty, parental educational attainment, caste and social exclusion, and school infrastructure. The findings indicate that extreme poverty leads to early entry to wage work, parents with low levels of schooling care less about education, social norms relating to caste and gender push certain groups further to the margins, and distance to school, a lack of sanitation, and irregular teacher attendance lead to greater levels of dropouts. The study suggests multi-sectoral approaches including conditional cash transfers, community awareness programs, investment in infrastructure, and policy enforcement to strengthen compulsory schooling. This research adds to the body of policy and practice aimed at reducing child labour and access to education in Uttar Dinajpur.
1. Agarwal, S. (2010). Gendered dimensions of child labour and schooling in rural Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(3), 231-240.
2. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., & Kremer, M. (2016). The impact of conditional cash transfers on schooling and child labour: Evidence from rural India. Economic Journal, 126(598), 439-470.
3. Basu, K., & Tzannatos, Z. (2003). Child labour: Issues, causes and interventions. IFPRI Social Protection Discussion Paper, 7, International Food Policy Research Institute.
4. Chatterjee, R., & Roy, S. (2020). Economic shocks and child labour as coping strategy: Evidence from rural West Bengal. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(2), 345-360.
5. Das, M., & Bandyopadhyay, D. (2014). Infrastructure, school distance and dropouts: A spatial analysis in West Bengal. Education Economics, 22(4), 401-416.
6. ILO. (2015). India: Child labour report 2015. International Labour Organization.
7. Majumdar, P. (2012). Caste and social exclusion in access to primary education: A case of West Bengal. Social Inclusion, 1(1), 66-78.
8. Patel, K. (2018). Seasonal migration, child labour and school continuity in border districts. Migration and Society, 15(1), 58-80.
9. Ray, R., & Lancaster, J. (2005). Parental education and child labour in India: New empirical evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(15), 1556-1564.
10. Sinha, R., & Ghosh, A. (2017). Perceptions of education in marginalised communities in northern Bengal. South Asian Studies, 33(2), 207-222.
11. Banerjee, K., & Mukherjee, P. (2019). Gender bias and schooling: Girls in child labour in West Bengal. Gender & Society, 33(4), 523-546.
12. Dasgupta, S., & Roy, L. (2018). Poverty, caste and year of schooling: Evidence from Uttar Dinajpur district. Journal of Indian Education, 44(3), 112-130.
13. Sen, M., & Bose, T. (2021). Barriers to education: Examining transportation, sanitation, and school quality in rural Bengal. Education for All Journal, 9(2), 89-105.
14. Roy, S., & Chattopadhyay, B. (2019). Child labour enforcement and legal gaps: A West Bengal perspective. Law and Policy Review, 15(1), 25-50.
15. Verma, H., & Singh, R. (2022). Impact of community awareness programmes on child labour in border districts. International Journal of Development Studies, 17(3), 145-165.
Copyright (c) 2025 Md. Yehya Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
