Towards Trustworthy Ai in Digital Banking: An Asian Regulatory Perspective
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Banking, FinTech Regulation, Trustworthy AI, Data Privacy, Asia-Pacific Legal FrameworksAbstract
Artificial intelligence is transforming digital banking worldwide, prompting regulators to reconcile innovation with legal safeguards. In Asia, fintech hubs like Singapore, China, India, and Japan are shaping unique responses that reflect national priorities and regulatory philosophies [1]. This article applies an IMRAD structure to examine regulatory approaches, highlight key legal challenges, and suggest a path toward trustworthy AI in banking. The study draws on comparative legal research, synthesizing policy documents, statutes, and scholarly commentary [2]. Results reveal varying models—from principles-based guidelines in Singapore to binding algorithm rules in China—yet all focus on fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, and consumer protection [3]. Discussion finds convergence on core ethical requirements, but implementation differences persist [4]. The article concludes that fostering trustworthy AI demands a balanced approach incorporating strict data protection, robust oversight, and regulatory sandboxes to encourage responsible innovation [5].
References
Rahman, A. (2022). AI-Powered Banking in Asia: Trends and Regulatory Insights. Journal of Financial Innovation, 12(3), 45–59.
Lim, P., & Chia, G. (2019). Algorithmic Accountability in Finance: Challenges and Responses in the Asia-Pacific. Banking and Technology Law Review, 7(2), 113–130.
World Economic Forum. (2021). Global AI Governance: A Framework for Trustworthy Innovation. WEF White Paper.
Ho, Y. (2022). Regulating AI in East Asia: Comparative Lessons from China, Japan, and Singapore. Asia Law Quarterly, 14(1), 23–41.
Eshоnkulоv J. (2025). The Role of Smart Contracts in Civil Law and Issues of Legal Regulation. Uzbek Journal of Law and Digital Policy, 3(1), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.59022/ujldp.294
Eshonkulov, J. (2024). Legal foundations for the application of artificial intelligence Technologies in the Sports Industry. American Journal of Education and Evaluation Studies, 1(7), 240-247. https://semantjournals.org/index.php/AJEES/article/view/320/287
Zetzsche, D., Buckley, R., Arner, D., & Barberis, J. (2020). Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 24(1), 31–76.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data (PCPD). (2021). Ethical AI Governance for Hong Kong’s Digital Future. PCPD Policy Guidance.
Twining, W. (2017). Globalisation and Comparative Law: Mapping the Terrain. In E. Örücü & D. Nelken (Eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (pp. 15–32). Hart Publishing.
Bank for International Settlements. (2020). The Supervision of AI in Finance: Experiences and Challenges. BIS Working Paper No. 830.
Farnsworth, D. (2023). Fintech Hubs in Asia: A Legal and Regulatory Overview. Asian Banking Law Journal, 9(4), 221–239.
Chuen, D., & Teo, E. (2021). Emerging Digital Banking Regulations in the Post-Pandemic Era. Singapore Academy of Law Journal, 33(2), 88–107.
Gozzi, K. (2019). Dimensions of AI Governance: From Bias to Oversight. Harvard International Law Review, 60(3), 251–269.
Casey, A., & Lemley, M. (2019). Disclosures, Explanations, and the Algorithmic Accountability Gap. Minnesota Law Review, 104(1), 1325–1360.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2018). Principles to Promote Fairness, Ethics, Accountability and Transparency (FEAT) in the Use of AI and Data Analytics in Finance. MAS Official Guidance.
Lee, H. (2020). An Overview of FEAT: Singapore’s Principles-Based Approach to AI in Finance. Journal of AI & Law, 10(4), 77–91.
MAS-SFA Veritas Consortium. (2021). Veritas Phase One Report: Enhancing Responsible AI in Financial Services. Singapore FinTech Association Report.
Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC). (2012, amended 2020). Personal Data Protection Act. Singapore Statutes Online.
Smart Nation & Digital Government Office (SNDGO). (2020). Model AI Governance Framework (2nd Edition). Government of Singapore.
Chua, T. (2022). Regulatory Nudges and the Governance of AI in Singapore’s Financial Sector. Stanford Journal of International Law & Technology, 18(3), 55–74.
Monetary Authority of Singapore. (2016). FinTech Regulatory Sandbox Guidelines. MAS Official Document.
Tan, L. (2021). Soft Law Effectiveness: Lessons from Singapore’s AI Principles. Asia-Pacific Technology Law & Policy, 5(2), 119–136.
Yang, X. (2021). A Legal Analysis of China’s AI Strategy: Balancing Innovation and Regulation. Peking University Law Journal, 29(2), 114–131.
Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). (2021). Provisions on the Administration of Algorithmic Recommendations. State Council Gazette.
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2021). Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China. NPC Official Gazette.
Liang, M. (2023). Enforcing PIPL in the Banking Sector: Mechanisms and Challenges. Tsinghua China Law Review, 45(1), 201–219.
Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC). (2023). Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services. State Council White Paper.
Zhao, H., & Chen, Y. (2023). Regulating Generative AI: China’s New Approach. Asia Tech Policy Review, 16(1), 67–89.
Chen, G. (2022). Over-Regulation of AI? Assessing the Impact of China’s Algorithm Rules on Innovation. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 11(3), 311–333.
Sahoo, D. (2022). AI in Indian Banking: Emerging Trends and Governance Challenges. Indian Banking and Finance Journal, 22(4), 75–91.
Sharma, A. (2021). Towards a Responsible AI Framework: A Study of India’s Evolving Policy Landscape. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 17(1), 21–39.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2019). Enabling Framework for Regulatory Sandbox. RBI Circular.
Bhatnagar, V. (2020). Evaluating the Effectiveness of India’s Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. Economic and Political Weekly, 14(12), 65–72.
Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2024). RBI Announces Formation of FREE-AI Committee. RBI Press Release.
Parliament of India. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act. New Delhi, India.
