Autonomy and Effect on Adolescents Socialization into Economic Independence Among the Bamileke of West Cameroon
Keywords:
Autonomy, Sociocultural-Values, Adolescents Socialization, Economic IndependenceAbstract
Purpose: Investigating autonomy and adolescent socialization into economic independence provides insights into the complex processes of identity formation, self-discovery and social integration. Research findings can inform parents, educators and policymakers on how to promote healthy autonomy development and socialization in adolescents leading to better outcomes in academic, social and emotional domains. The knowledge on autonomy can help identify factors that contribute to or protect against adolescent problems such as substance abuse, mental health issues or antisocial behaviour. Understanding the interplay between autonomy and socialization during adolescent can inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at promoting positive youth development, preventing problem behaviours or supporting adolescents facing specific challenges. Investigating autonomy and socialization across different cultural, socioeconomic, environmental contexts can reveal how these factors influence adolescent development and inform culturally sensitive practices. By understanding how autonomy and socialization intersect, researchers can identify ways to promote mental health, well-being and resilience in adolescents, contributing to a heathier and more supportive society. Findings from such study can guide the development of policies and programs aimed at supporting adolescent development such as youth empowerment initiative, mentoring programs or community-based services. This study sought to examine the effect of autonomy on adolescent socialization into economic independence among the Bamileke of West Cameroon. The ecological theory of Urie Bronfenbrenner (1979) provided the theoretical underpinning of this study.
Materials and methods: The study adopted the concurrent nested mixed method research design which is an approach that requires both qualitative and quantitative data to be collected at the same time or in parallel within the same study. Quantitatively a questionnaire was used to test the effect of autonomy on adolescent socialization among the Bamileke of West Cameroon while qualitatively a semi-structured interview was conducted with 16 parents. The study side was the Bamileke society of the West region of Cameroon. With regard to sample 384 adolescents and 16 parents were recruited from 8 selected villages (Bamedousso, Bamekoue, Bamougong, Bangang, Bamendjing, Bamenyam, Bamessingue, Balatchi) of the Bamboutos Division in the West Region of Cameroon. The sampling techniques used for the study were the simple random sampling, the purposive sampling and the snow ball sampling. Therefore, in the Bamboutos Division which is made up of four sub-divisions which are Babadjou, Batcham, Ngalim and Mbouda, the villages were selected though simple random sampling whereby the names of the villages were written on pieces of papers, reshuffled and selected. Adolescents were purposively selected because the researcher identified some of the characteristics, she was looking for such as adolescents staying with their parents with age bracket 15 to 20. Parents were selected through snowball sampling because adolescents assisted the researcher in identifying other parents. A questionnaire with determined internal reliability coefficient was used for information gathering. Data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings: Results show that autonomy was able to explain the variations in economic independence at 86.4%. Analysis also suggested that a unit increase in the level of autonomy will increase socialization into economic independence at 1.031 units. Furthermore, results confirmed the model as a good fit (F= 111.567), consequently the null hypothesis was rejected.
Implications to theory, practice and policy: Understanding autonomy and adolescent socialization can refine theories of adolescent development such as self-determination theory and social learning theory. Recognizing the interplay between autonomy and adolescent socialization highlights the importance of considering contextual factors in developmental theories. Incorporating cultural variations can enrich theoretical frameworks and promote more nuanced understanding of adolescent development. Parents and caregivers can foster healthy autonomy development by balancing guidance with gradual increases in independence and decision-making opportunities. Educators can promote autonomy-supportive learning environments, encouraging student autonomy, self-regulation and motivation. Mental health and counsellors can focus on autonomy related issues such as self-esteem, identity and decision making. Community-based programs can design activities and services that promote autonomy, socialization and positive youth development. Policymakers can develop and implement policies that promote autonomy- learning environments such as student – centered learning and flexible curriculum design. Governments and organizations can establish initiatives that foster adolescent autonomy such as youth leadership programs, mentorship schemes and community engagement projects. Policies can be developed to protect adolescent’s rights to autonomy, dignity, self-determination while ensuring their safety and well-being.
References
1. Acemoglu, D; & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Publishing.
2. Allen, J.P; & Hauser, S.T. (2011). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26 (1), 3-30.
3. Anderson, L; & McCabe, D.B. (2012). A co - constructed world: Adolescent self-socialization on the internet. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31 (2), 240-253.
4. APA. (2002). Developing adolescents: A reference for professionals.
5. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55 (5), 469-480.
6. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: A Cultural Approach. Pearson Education.
7. Aldous, J. (2006). Family contexts and financial socialization. Journal of Family Issues, 27 (14), 1821-1844.
8. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Barber, B. L., & Serido, J. (2012). Financial Socialization and budgeting: A developmental perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 33 (14), 3571-3594.
10. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of Parental authority and control on child development. In J.P. McHale & P. A. Cowan (Eds.), Understanding How Family Level Dynamics Affect Children’s Development (PP. 193-225). Guilford Press.
11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.
12. Chirkov, V. I; & Ryan, R.M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russia and U.S. adolescents: Common effects on well -being and academic motivation. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 32 (5), 618-635.
13. Cliggett, L. (2003). Gift Remittances and Economic Agency among the Gwembe Tonga of Zambia. Journal of Anthropological Research, 59 (3), 325-344.
14. Deci, E. L; & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-268.
15. Eisenberg, N; & Miller, P.A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (1), 91-119.
16. Ghai, D.P. (1973). Concepts and strategies of economic independence. Journal of Modern African Studies, 11, 21-42.
17. Helmy, H.E. (2022). New estimates of the economic independence index: Is economic independence necessary for sustaining economic growth? Journal of economic issues, 56 (3), 904-936.
18. Hill, H. (2017). Autonomy support and adolescent socialization: A systematic review. Journal of adolescent research, 32 (1), 3-30.
19. Laursen, B; & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent-child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp.3-42).
20. Mirabelle, Y.L; Mbebeb, F.E; & Nji, A.R. (2023). Entrepreneurial habits and adolescent socialization into economic independence among the Bamileke of West Cameroon. American Journal of Psychology, 5 (2), 9-25.
21. Padilla-Walker, L.M; & Chistensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents’ prosocial behaviors towards strangers, friends and family. Journal of Research on adolescence, 21 (3), 545-551.
22. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray.
23. Rodrik, D. (2007). One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions and economic growth. Princeton University Press.
24. Saravanan, S. (2022). Social Adjustment among adolescents in relation to their gender and locality. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 9 (6), 345-352.
25. Soenens, B; & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30 (1), 74-99.
26. UNICEF. (2011). The state of the world’s children 2011: Adolescence-an age of opportunity.
27. Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Allen & Unwin.
28. Weru, J. (2020). Entrepreneurship and economic development in Kenya. University of Nairobi.
29. Werenth, (2004). Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Small Business Economics, 23 (2), 109-125.
30. Winstone, L; Mars, B; Haworth, C. M. A; & Kidger, J. (2021). Social media use and social connectedness among adolescents in the United Kingdom: A qualitative exploration of displacement and stimulation. BMC Public Health, 21 (1), 1736.