Effective Management of the Interaction of Education, Science and Business in the Context of Globalization
Keywords:
Triple Helix model, globalization, education-science-business interaction, innovation management, cross-sector collaborationAbstract
In the context of globalization, the synergy between education, science, and business has become vital for fostering innovation and sustainable socio-economic development. Despite widespread recognition of their interdependence, many national systems still struggle with aligning institutional priorities and facilitating effective collaboration. This study addresses the existing knowledge gap by investigating the management dynamics of these interactions across diverse geopolitical contexts, with a focus on practical and structural enablers of integration. A qualitative, survey-based methodology was employed, collecting responses from 63 stakeholders representing universities, research institutions, and business enterprises in Uzbekistan, Germany, Singapore, Finland, and Brazil. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s framework, supplemented by descriptive statistics for selected metrics. Findings indicate that while institutional asymmetries and communication barriers persist, the rise of digital platforms, innovation intermediaries, and cross-literate leadership significantly enhance coordination and output. Respondents emphasized the role of adaptive governance and co-designed curricula in promoting more meaningful cross-sectoral engagement. The study contributes to the theoretical extension of the Triple Helix model by highlighting the evolving role of digitalization and leadership as critical factors in managing triadic collaborations. Practically, the findings suggest the need for policy frameworks that not only incentivize partnerships but also invest in collaborative infrastructure and human capacity. Future research should explore longitudinal impacts of leadership programs, regional innovation ecosystems, and the inclusion of non-traditional stakeholders in shaping a resilient global knowledge economy.
References
1. H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, "The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations," Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123, 2000.
2. M. Ranga and H. Etzkowitz, "Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society," Industry and Higher Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 237–262, 2013.
3. L. Leydesdorff, "The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model," arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.4553, 2012.
4. M. Guerrero and D. Urbano, "The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises and their influence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 147, pp. 60–75, 2019.
5. B. Clarysse, M. Wright, and J. Van Hove, "A look inside accelerators: Building businesses from science and engineering," Technovation, vol. 107, p. 102274, 2021.
6. M. Perkmann et al., "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 423–442, 2013.
7. J. Youtie and P. Shapira, "Innovation intermediaries in emerging markets," Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2017.
8. M. Gulbrandsen and S. Slipersæter, "The use of performance indicators in research evaluation: More than just measuring," Science and Public Policy, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 74–83, 2018.
9. Y. Cai, "Enhancing context sensitivity of the Triple Helix model: An institutional logics perspective," Triple Helix, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2013.
10. M. N. Dudin et al., "The Triple Helix Model as a Mechanism for Partnership between the State, Business, and the Scientific-Educational Community in the Area of Organizing National Innovation Development," Asian Social Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 153–161, 2015.
11. J. Becker and D. B. Smith, "The Need for Cross-Sector Collaboration," Stanford Social Innovation Review, 2018.
12. OECD, Cross-sector and interprofessional collaborations, OECD Publishing, 2022.
13. J. R. Henig et al., Cross-Sector Collaboration in Education: Comparative Case Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2016.
14. D. F. J. Campbell, "Triple Helix or Quadruple Helix: Which Model of Innovation to Choose for Knowledge Society?" Science and Public Policy, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 611–620, 2021.
15. M. S. Tosun, "Triple Helix Model of International Collaboration," University of Nevada, Reno, 2022.
