Achieving Sustainable Leadership through E-Government Practices in Anambra State Civil Service
Keywords:
Achievement, sustainability, leadership, e-governmentAbstract
The study examined achieving sustainable leadership through e-government practices. In order to carry out this study, specified research objectives were drawn from which null hypotheses were formulated and used for the study. The research design for this study is an Expost Facto design. The population of the study consisted of all the staff of Ministry of Finance. Simple random sampling technique was used to select 100respondents out of the population. The instrument used for data collection was questionnaire. Data from completed questionnaires was subjected to Independent t-test analysis. The findings showed and concluded that The administration would appoint e-govern implementation committees that will determine the specifics of implementation, review the outcomes, and establish a framework for reporting efficacy with a. to set up ICT framework units in each of the Federal ministries and parastals, with permanent secretaries as head The ICT Ministry may interact with implementation committees at different levels of the government to test and improve the government's implementation. The government can also implement ICT laws that require every public and civil servant to be computer literate. Additionally, the policy should provide digital training courses for public servants. In order to complete the above, the obstacles would be eliminated as well as providing state-of-of-the-the-the-art egovernance for the region. The application of e-governance should be to all civil sector organizations.
References
1. Akman, B., A. Yazici, A. Mishra,, and A. Arifoglu. [2005] ‘Leadership for sustainable innovation’, International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 29 August, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.135–149.
2. Ayo, D., & Ekong, M., (2008) ‘Developing sustainable leaders through coaching and compassion ’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp.8–24.
3. Ayo, B., (2014) from ‘Sustainability and the Liberal Arts’ Conference, found in Sustainability Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) for Colleges and Universities, University Leaders for a
4. Bansode, U., & Patil, F., (2011) ‘Creating conditions to nourish sustainable organizational excellence’, Total Quality Management, October–November, Vol. 16, Nos. 8–9, pp.925–943.
5. Budhiraja, B., (2003) ‘The sustainability of sustainability – a study into the conceptual foundations of the notion of the notion of sustainability ’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, March, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.1–33.
6. Chau. H., (2006) ‘Sustainability leadership: co-creating a sustainable future’, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 7, pp.25–35.
7. Corley, D., & Gioia, I., (2011) ‘Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research ’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.874–907.
8. Dada, O., (2006) ‘The challenges of eco-leadership’, Greener Management International, Spring.
9. Ferdig, O., (2007) The ROI of Sustainability: Making the Business Case, available at http://www.aberdeen.com/summary/report/benchmark/5908-RA-sustainability-environmentalstewardship.asp (accessed on 29 August 2009).
10. Gberevbie, E., Ayo, N., Iyoha, N., Duruji, N., & Abasilim, P., (2015) ‘Organizational sustainability: a case for formulation of a tailor made definition’, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management, March, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.1–18.
11. Godse, J., & Garg, R., (2009) ‘Symposium – sustainability and public administration’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp.370–374.
12. Porter, M. (1996) ‘What is strategy?’, Harvard Business Review, November, Vol. 74, No. 6, pp.61–78.
13. Graham, S. and Aurigi, S., (1997) ‘Sustainable development and sustainability of competitive advantage: a dynamic and sustainable view of the firm ’, Sustainable Development and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.135–146.
14. Heeks, F., (2001) The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’s Best-run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environment Success – and How You Can Too, John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA.
15. Kabir, S., and Baniamin, K., (2011) ‘The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability’, Academy of Management Review, October, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.936–960.
16. NITP, (2000) A General Framework for E-Government: Definition Maturity Challenges, Opportunities, and Success, European Journal of Scientific Research 39 (1), 29-42
17. Nworgu, B., (1991) E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model, Government Information Quarterly 23 (2), 236-248
18. Ojo, B., (2014) The Quality Framework of e-Government Development, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronics Governance; Cairo, Egypt
19. Okwueze, B., (2010) Creating a Sustainable Public Sector: the role of ICTs, Available at http://s3.amazonaws.com/connected_republic/attachments/10/Microsoft_Word_-_Discussion_paper_-_public_sector_sustainability_v2.pdf, (2008); visited Feb. 2011
20. Olaopa, A., (2014) The Failure of E-government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review, The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries 26 (1), 1-10
21. Rede, A. and Mansell, R., (1998) The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4), 9–30
22. Shilubane, B., (2001) Estevez, E., Sustaining Electronic Governance Programs in Developing Countries, 11th European Conference on e-Government; Ljubljana, Slovenia (2001)
23. Budhiraja, K., (2003) Developing Organizational Capabilities in SMEs: Enabling Environmentally Sustainable ICT, BLED 2009 Proceedings, Paper 24,
24. Ojo, U., (2014) The Role of ICT in Sustainable Development: Some Challenges for Developing Countries, 55th Pugwash Conference Hiroshima, Japan (2005)
25. Veljković et al., (2014) Stages of e-government interoperability, Electronic Government, An International Journal 5 (3) 23
26. Heeks, R., (2001) Building e-Governance for Development: A Framework for National and Donor Action, I-Government Working Paper no. 12, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, UK,
27. Hussein, R., Karim, N.S.A., The impact of technological factors on information systems success in the electronic-government context, Business Process Management Journal 13 (5), 613-627
28. Ikerd, J., Understanding and Managing the Multi-dimensions of Sustainable Agriculture, Presented at the Southern Region Sustainable Agriculture Professional Development Program Workshop, SARE
29. Regional Training Consortium, Gainesville, FL, http://web.missouri.edu/~ikerdj/papers/NC-MULTD.htm (1997) visited on Feb 16, 2012.
30. Janowski, T., Measuring Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development: From Ranking to Learning, EGOV Global Exchange, Singapore (2011), http://egovexchange.com/pdfs/% 5BeGov%20Forum%5D%20Tomasz%20Janowski%20-%20Sustainable%20Development.pdf
31. Kanungo, S., Sustainable benefits of IT investments: From concept to implementation, AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, Paper 128, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2004/128 (2004)
32. Kidd, C.V., The evolution of sustainability, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1), 1-26 (1992)
33. Korokola, G., Yngstrom, L., Kowalski, S., Secure e-Government Services: A Comparative Analysis of e-Government Maturity Models for the Developing Regions – The Need for Security Services, Int. Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8 (1), 1-25 (2012)
34. Kumar, R., Making E-Government Projects in Developing countries more successful and sustainable: Some Case Studies from India, Paper presented in CPR South 2007: Research for Improving ICT Governance in the Asia-Pacific, The Asian Institute of management, Manila, Philippines (2007)
35. Kumar, R., Best, M. L., (2006) Impact and Sustainability of E-Government Services in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from Tamil Nadu, India; The Information Society, 22, 1-12,
36. Laszlo A., Laszlo, K.C., Dunsky, H., (2010) Redefining Success: Designing Systemic Sustainable Strategies, Systems Research and Behavioral Science 27, 3-21
37. Morefield, L., Tapp, R., Blades, C., Kelley, G., A (2004) Method for the Quantitative Assessment of the Impact and Sustainability of the KCTCS ERP Initiative, AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, Paper 127, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2004/127 (2004)
