Ethical Misuse of Ai in Decision-Making Processes in Healthcare
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), ethical misuse, healthcare decision-making, patient autonomy, algorithmic biasAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly deployed in healthcare decision-making – from diagnostics and treatment recommendations to resource allocation and insurance claims – offering significant benefits in efficiency and accuracy. However, the misuse or uncritical reliance on AI systems poses serious legal and ethical risks. This article provides a comprehensive legal-academic analysis of these risks, anchored in international human rights principles, medical ethics, and emerging regulatory frameworks. We employ doctrinal and comparative methods to examine how different jurisdictions (notably the European Union, United States, and Singapore) are responding to challenges such as bias and discrimination in AI algorithms, threats to patient privacy and autonomy, and the problem of assigning responsibility for automated or semi-automated decisions. A focused case study on Uzbekistan’s developing approach to AI in the medical sector is included, highlighting existing norms, initiatives, and regulatory challenges in that jurisdiction. The discussion synthesizes international guidelines (from bodies like UNESCO, WHO, OECD, and the Council of Europe) and national laws, and evaluates procedural safeguards needed to ensure that AI deployment in healthcare remains aligned with ethical duties and legal accountability. We conclude by emphasizing the need for robust, harmonized legal frameworks and oversight mechanisms that protect patients’ rights and safety while fostering innovation in medical AI.
References
1. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
2. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health, World Health Organization, 2021.
3. OECD Principles on AI, OECD Legal Instrument OECD/LEGAL/0449, adopted May 2019 (updated 2024).
4. Report on the Application of AI in Healthcare and its impact on the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Steering Committee for Human Rights in Biomedicine and Health, CDBIO, April 2023.
5. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Guidelines (AIHGle), MOH/HSA/IHIS, October 2021. Singapore Ministry of Health.
6. Health Sciences Authority (HSA) Regulatory Guidelines on AI Medical Devices, 2022.
7. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. DP-6079, “On approval of the Strategy ‘Digital Uzbekistan–2030’ and measures for its effective implementation”, 5 October 2020.
8. Kucharov, K., “Regulating AI in Uzbekistan: Balancing Innovation and Risk,” Uzbekistan Law Blog, 2024 .
9. Ibaroudene, L., et al., “Shaping the future of AI in healthcare through ethics and governance,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 75 (2023)
10. Wong, J., “AI in healthcare: legal and ethical considerations in this new frontier,” International Bar Association, 2023 .
11. Payne, D., “Who pays when AI steers your doctor wrong?”, Politico, 24 March 2024 .
12. Hern, A., “Royal Free breached UK data law in 1.6m patient deal with Google’s DeepMind,” The Guardian, 3 July 2017 .