Psychological and Pedagogical Factors in the Formation of Professional and Spiritual Aesthetics
Keywords:
Professional-spiritual aesthetics, psychological and pedagogical factors, motivationAbstract
This article examines the psychological and pedagogical factors influencing the formation of professional and spiritual aesthetics in the educational process. In today’s rapidly changing social and cultural environment, developing teachers’ and students’ capacity for professional integrity, ethical responsibility, and aesthetic sensibility is of paramount importance. The study highlights the role of psychological determinants such as motivation, self-awareness, and emotional intelligence, as well as pedagogical aspects including value-based education, interactive learning methods, and the integration of national and universal cultural heritage.
The paper argues that fostering professional and spiritual aesthetics requires a holistic approach that combines cognitive, emotional, and moral development. It emphasizes the importance of the teacher’s personality as a role model, the use of innovative teaching technologies, and the creation of a supportive learning environment where creativity, cultural sensitivity, and moral responsibility are actively cultivated. Furthermore, the research underlines that continuity in self-development, the promotion of ethical values, and the integration of interdisciplinary approaches significantly contribute to shaping individuals with high spiritual culture and professional refinement.
The conclusions drawn from the analysis suggest that the formation of professional-spiritual aesthetics not only enhances the quality of education but also strengthens learners’ ability to adapt to modern challenges, develop harmonious interpersonal relationships, and contribute responsibly to society.
References
1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
2. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London: Routledge.
5. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.
6. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
8. Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
9. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Palmer, P. J. (1997). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
