Efcc's Function in Nigerian Governance, Politics, And Electoral Malpractice, The Viewpoint of the Efcc's Abuja Head Quarter

Abstract

Therefore, this essay looks at political corruption in the context of election preparation and in light of recent advancements in the battle against the threat. The list of advisors A recent report from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, or EFCC, is stirring up debate in the political arena and serves as a reminder that the Commission and politicians do not have romantic relationships. In other words, nothing more agitates the typical Nigerian politician than a danger to his or her political goals, and nothing brings Nigerian politicians together more than the identification of a shared foe. This may help to explain the widespread indignation that followed the EFCC's publication of a list of politicians to political parties, warning them not to field certain candidates in the general elections scheduled for April 2015. The EFCC made it apparent when it released the list that it was only advisory and that it lacked the authority to prevent anyone from contesting the General elections in 2015. Lawyers and other right-wing activists attacked the EFCC, claiming that it is rapidly entering a period of lawlessness, just as the Commission was ready to justify its removal off the list. As the April election approaches, this essay explores the risks and difficulties that Nigeria faces due to political corruption. It looks at the idea of political corruption, its sources and effects, and how to prevent it from happening in the political system. In the paper's conclusion, INEC and the parties are praised for removing themselves from the list. This stands in stark contrast to the events leading up to the 2007 elections, when the Obasanjo-led Ahmadu Ali-led PDP wrote to Iwu's INEC to prevent some of its members from running the elections.