Cognitive Principles of Literary Text Interpretation

Authors

  • Ismailova Sevara Teacher, Department Integrated English Language Course -2, Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Keywords:

cognitive psychology, literary interpretation, schema theory, narrative transportation, reader response

Abstract

This article studies the impact of cognition on the interpretation of literary texts. It discusses the cognitive phenomenon of schema theory, mental simulation, narrative transportation, as well as working memory, attention, and prior knowledge, focusing on the reader's experience. It illustrates how meaning is dynamically constructed through the activation of cognitive schemata and the simulation of engagement with narrative frameworks. Moreover, how emotions, empathy, and other individual differences factor into interpretive responses is discussed. Synthesizing research from a variety of disciplines, this paper claims exploring the cognitive processes of reading, deepens insights into interpreting literature and teaching it in a way that recognizes the reader as an active, constructive agent. The article offers suggestions on how future research can integrate the cognitive sciences and literary studies.

References

Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice, redux. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 329–356.

Anderson, R. C. (1977). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.

Kensinger, E. A. (2009). What factors need to be considered to understand emotional memory? Emotion Review, 1(2), 120–122.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (Vol. 5, pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(2), 122–140.

Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-27

How to Cite

Sevara, I. (2025). Cognitive Principles of Literary Text Interpretation. American Journal of Education and Evaluation Studies, 2(5), 248–251. Retrieved from https://semantjournals.org/index.php/AJEES/article/view/1794

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.