Continuous assessment practices and impact on students’ learning outcomes in Secondary Schools in the South West Region of Cameroon
Keywords:
Assessment, Continuous assessment, formative assessment and sequential assessmentAbstract
The study sought to find out if assessment practices have a significant impact on students’ learning outcomes in Secondary schools. The general objective of the study was to investigate the impact of continuous assessment ( CA) practices on students’ learning outcomes. The specific objectives were to find out the impact of formative and sequential assessment practices on students’ learning outcomes. The main research questions were what is the impact of assessment practices on students’ learning outcomes? The general hypothesis was that assessment practices have a significant impact on students’ learning outcomes. The research method adopted was the mixed method using the explanatory sequential design. The population of the study comprised students and teachers of secondary schools in the South West Region. The target population was students and teachers of the three selected divisions namely; Fako, Meme and Manyu. The accessible population comprised form four students and teachers in some accessible schools from the three selected divisions. The sample for the study comprised of twelve (12) schools selected within the three divisions. The two main instruments of the study were questionnaire for students and interview guide for teachers. The convenience, purposive and simple random sampling techniques were used to select the sample size comprised of 382 form four students and 24 teachers. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, that is, frequencies, percentages and Pearson product correlation coefficient. The findings showed that continuous assessment practices have a great influence on students’ learning outcomes. Findings showed that formative and sequential assessments practices have a great impact on students’ learning outcome. Findings also revealed that sequential assessment has great impact on students’ learning outcomes. All the 2 null hypotheses were rejected while the 2 alternative hypotheses were retained. The conclusion was that formative and sequential assessments have great impact on students’ learning outcomes . The study thus recommends an adequate implementation of formative and sequential assessments practices in our school system to enhance students’ learning outcomes. Teachers should be motivated to effectively implement assessment practices in the teaching-learning process.
References
Ababio, B.T., & Dumba, H. (2014). The value of CA Strategies in Students’ Learning Geography in Senior High Schools in Ghana. Journal of International Geographical Education. 4(1), 40-57.
Agborbechem, P. (2015). Sorting in Examinations: Evaluating the quality of assessment in universities in Cameroon. International research journal of Arts and social science 4(5), 93-97.
Agborbechem, P. T., & Frinwie, B. N. (2013). School Based Assessment Practices as Predictors of Final Grades in Examinations Organized by the Cameroon GCE Board. Journal of Educational Assessment in Africa. 8(1), 87- 92.
Amin, E. M. (2005). Social Science Research: conception, methodology and analysis. Makerere University press. and Personal Life. Pearson Education.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Journal of Educational Leadership, 57(5), 1 3-1 8.
Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Journal of Educational Assessment, 5(10).
Andrade, H. L., & Heritage, M. (2018). Using formative assessment to enhance learning. Journal of Educational Assessment 10(7).
Assessment Reform Group (ARG,2002). Beyond the Black Box: Types of assessment. Nuffied foundation.
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative Meta-synthesis. Journal of instruction, 5(3), 31-39.
Awandia, J. T. (2009). Physics Teachers Classroom Behaviour and Students’ Academic. Achievement in the South West Region of Cameroon. M.Ed. thesis, University of Buea, unpublished.
Awandia, J. T. (2022). Assessment for learning and Assessment of learning: A Suggestion for appropriate balance at the Cameroon GCE Board. Int. journal of education, business and economics research (IJEBER). 2, 3, 183-186.
Black, P. & William, D. (2012). Hand book on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student learning. McGraw-Hill.
Black, P., & William, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. The 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 20–50). University of Chicago Press.
Black, P., &William, D. (1998a) Assessment and classroom learning in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. Journal of Education and assessment. 5(1), 7-74.
Black, P., &William, D. (1998b) Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. PHI Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-44.
Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. Open Access Library Journal. 22(4),5–12.
Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Assessment theory for College classrooms. SAGE Publications.
Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative assessment: A review of the literature. In H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative assessment classroom: Theory into practice. Open Access Library Journal. (pp 29–42).
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to use grading to improve learning. ASCD.
Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010). Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. Open Access Library Journal. 17(1), 41–58.
Cameroon (1995). National forum on Education (22-27 may 1995): Final report, Ministry of National Education.
Cameroon. (1996). Order No. 78/B1/1464/MINEDUC/SD/IGP/ESG/ESTP/EPMN 31st JULY1996. Yaoundé: Ministry of National Education.
Cameroon. (1998). Law no 98/004 of 14th April 1998 to lay down guidelines for education in Cameroon. Ministry of National Education.
Circular Nº 727/16/1464/ MINESEC/SEESEN/SG/DECC/SDOEC of 12/16/2016. Yaounde, Ministry of Secondary Education. National Press
Cizek, C. (2000, Eds.). Handbook of formative assessment. (pp. 181–197). Routledge.
Clark, I (2013).” Efficacy of Formative Classroom Assessment in Theory and Practice” Washington University Press.
Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: A systematic and artistic process of instruction for supporting school and lifelong learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(2), 24– 40.
Couville, T. G. (2004). An Empirical Comparison of Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory. Texas University Press.
Creswell, J.W., & Creswell J.D (2022). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. 6th edition, SAGE publications.
Denga, D. I. (1987). Educational Measurement, Continuous Assessment and Psychological Testing. Rapid Educational publishers.
Dunlosky, J, Katherine, A, Elizabeth, J & Daniel, T (2013). Improving Students’ learning with effective learning techniques. University of Virginia press
Ebok, R. E. (2002). Impact of a Sequential assessment system on teaching: The perception of English Language teachers in public schools in Fako Division. M.Ed. thesis, University of Buea, unpublished.
Ebok, R.E. (2021). Classroom assessment and students’ learning of English Language in Secondary schools in the South west Region of Cameroon. PhD thesis, University of Buea, unpublished.
Faleye, B. A., & Adefisoye, B. T. (2016). Continuous assessment practices of secondary school teachers in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of psychology and behavioural science, 4(1), 44-45.
Foncha, K. N., Awa, J. T., & Ndi, B.F. (2020). The Compulsory Sequential System of Assessment in Cameroon: Evidence of a Conceptual misunderstanding. International journal of trend in scientific research and development, 4 (3) April 2020, 30-40.
Gagne, R. M, Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Harcourt Brace.
Gagne, R.M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. 5th Ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and Sequential Assessments in the classroom. Educational assessment, 5(10).
Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and summative assessments. Educational
Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers' Summative Practices and Assessment for Learning - Tensions and Synergies. International Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207-223.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to formative assessment. Educational Assessment, 10(7), 70-79.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. Academic Research Library Journal. 77(1), 81-112.
Hayford, S.K (2007). Continuous assessment practices and Lower Attaining Learners in Primary and Junior Secondary schools in Ghana. University of Birmingham press.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lord, F. & Novick, M. (1968). Statistical theories of mental Test Scores. Open Journal of Statistics 1(2),12-23. McGraw-Hill Education.
Monono, E. H., & Foncha, N.K. (2014). Teachers’ Perspective of the effectiveness of the compulsory Sequential Assessment Schedule in secondary schools by the Ministry of Secondary Education in Cameroon. Journal of Educational Assessment in Africa, 9,51-55. Association for Educational Assessment in Africa.
Ngonganang, C. A. (2021). Learner differences and performance at the advanced level Chemistry in the General Certificate of education examination in Cameroon. Ph.D. thesis, University of Buea.
Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational Assessments of Students (3rd Edition) Prentice Hall Inc.
Nsamenang, A. B., & Tchombe, T. M. (2011). Hand Book of African Educational Theories and Practices. A Generative Teacher Education Curriculum. HDRC.
Okonkwo, S. C. (2002). Formative evaluation of continuous assessment standards and practices in Nigerian secondary schools. Journal of education practices, vol 6(1), 125-136.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005). Formative Assessment – Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms, OECD, Paris.
Popham, W. J. (2003). "Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know." Pearson
Ramalepe, M. (2015). A model for a successful Implementation of Continuous Assessment in Limpopo Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Instruction. 1(5). 60-78.
Ramsden, p. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. Kogan page.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher,
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Assessment for learning: Building a culture of confident learners. Pearson Education.
Stiggins, R. J. (2007). "Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders." Pearson Education.
Tambo, L. I (2012). Principles and methods of teaching.2nd Edition ANUCAM Press.
Tambo, L. I. (2003). Cameroon National Education Policy since the 1995 Forum. Design House.
Tambo, L.I. (2003). Principles and Methods of teaching: Application in Cameroon schools. ANUCAM publishers.
UNESCO. (1990). World Declaration of Education for All: meeting basic learning needs. UNESCO press.
UNESCO. (2015). Framework for action: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. UNESCO press.
UNESCO. (2017). Continuous assessment for improved teaching and learning: A critical review to inform policy and practice. International Bureau of Education. No. 13(1).
USAID. (United States Department of Education 2006). Meeting the Challenges of a changing world: Strengthening education for the 21th century. gov’t printing press.
William, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation. Journal of education and assessment. 37(1), 3-14.
